Rebirth to Physical Life (2)

This is the conclusion to “Rebirth to Physical Life (1)”.  Part 1 should be read first, before continuing with this Part 2.  Also, I suggest you read “Universal Christian Salvation”, before proceeding here.

In “Rebirth to Physical Life (1)”, we read about God’s future for the men of ancient Sodom, and for men in both the northern kingdom of Israel and the southern kingdom of Judah in the light of Ezk.37:1-14.  A physical rebirth.  The apostle Paul wrote in Ro.11:26, “All Israel shall be saved”.  Not just a remnant!

We considered the book of Job, when he was suffering.  Jb.1:21 Tanakh KJV Septúagint “Naked came I forth from my mother’s womb, and naked shall I return there.”  Job indicated he could later be reborn from a mother’s womb, his spirit indwelling a human newborn!  Job symbolically compared himself to the ancient phoenix bird (Jb.29:18 Tanakh), which would live again after a cycle of 500 or 1,000 years.  (see Part 1.)  cf. Re.20:5 “The rest of the dead lived not again until the 1,000 years were completed.”  Re.20:8 the dead, resurrected and returned to physical life, would inhabit “nations” of the earth.

Where in the Bible do we read of an individual, a human spirit, indwelling a second physical body…a personality who later did return to a mother’s womb (as Job indicated) to live another physical life?

The prophet Elijah lived in the early 800s BC.  He was a famous character in Israel’s history.  There’s no scriptural record of Elijah’s death.  2Ki.2:1-14 he was translated into heaven by a whirlwind.

{Sidelight: Elijah’s immediate successor Elisha then received a double portion of God’s Holy Spirit, unlike other “sons of the prophets”.  Elisha performed miracles (ref 2Ki.2:9, 15, 1Co.12:28-29).  Poole Commentary 2Ki.2:9 “Elisha seems to have had a greater portion of the prophetical and miraculous gifts of God’s Spirit.”  Elisha still had his own human spirit of course; it wasn’t replaced by Elijah’s spirit!}

In the 400s BC the Lord said in Mal.3:1, “Behold, I will send My messenger; he will prepare the way before Me”.  Mal.4:5 “Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the great and dreadful day of the Lord.”  Consequently, the Jews expected a bodily return of Elijah.  Alfred Edersheim The Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah, p.100 “The coming of Elijah…he was to appear personally.”  Traditionally, each spring they’d set a place for Elijah at the Passover Seder table and leave the door open for him.  Rabbi David Kimchi “When God shall bring him [Elijah] to life in the body, He shall send him to Israel.”  He’d be sent from God, bodily.

John the Baptist was a man “sent from God” (Jn.1:6).  Lk.1:13, 24-27 John was born 6 months before Jesus.  John’s mother was Mary’s aunt Elizabeth.  Mk.1:1-4 John “prepared the way” for Jesus’ ministry.

Jesus identified John the Baptizer as the Elijah who was to come!  Jesus said of John in Mt.11:13-14, “This is Elijah”.  John the Baptist was the Elijah who had lived approximately 900 years before!  Jesus said later in Mt.17:12-13, “Elijah has already come, and they didn’t recognize him. Then His disciples understood He was talking to them about John the Baptist.”  Cambridge Bible Mt.17:12 “[Many Jews] didn’t recognize him as the Elijah prophesied by Malachi.”  Mk.9:13 re John, “Elijah has indeed come”.

The angel Gabriel foretold Zacharias re John his son to be. Lk.1:14-17 “He will go before Him [Jesus] in the spirit and power of Elijah”.  The same human spirit in Elijah was in John the Baptizer.  Both were empowered to call the people to repentance.  Jews believe Elijah will return bodily.  He did.

Let’s now notice several similarities between the lives of Elijah and John the Baptizer:

Both dwelt in the wilderness east of the Jordan River (1Ki.17:2-6 & Mt.3:1-3, Lk.1:80).

Both characteristically wore a shaggy cloak and a leather belt (2Ki.1:8 & Mt.3:4).

Both were witnesses for the true God (1Ki.18:37 & Jn.1:14-15).

Both mocked their opponents who displayed a form of religion (1Ki.18:27 & Mt.3:7-9).

Both reproved their wicked king who disobeyed God (1Ki.18:17-18 Aháb & Lk.3:18-19 Herod Ántipas).

Both were wanted dead by the king’s evil wife (1Ki.19:2 Ahab/Jezébel & Mk.6:17-24 Herod/Herodiás).

Both endorsed their replacement, Elisha and Jesus (1Ki.19:16, 19 & Mk.1:9, Jn.3:28-30).

John the Baptizer even ministered at the same site on the east bank of the Jordan River from where Elijah had been taken up into heaven 900 years before (2Ki.2:1-14)!  Scripture reflects too many similar characteristics for it to be just coincidence.  They were the same personality, the same human spirit.

Ja.5:17 Elijah was a man with faulty human nature, as we.  He made mistakes, one serious.  1Ki.18:4, 13 Israel’s evil queen Jezebel had killed prophets of the Lord.  Elijah took vengeance by killing Jezebel’s false prophets.  1Ki.18:40 “Elijah said to them [Israel], ‘Seize the prophets of Báal [450 men, v.22]; don’t let one of them escape.’ They seized them; and Elijah brought them down to the brook Kishón and slew them there.”  Ellicott Commentary 1Ki.18:40 “The ruthless slaughter of Baal’s prophets.  Pulpit Commentary 1Ki.18:40 “It is true that the spirit of Elijah was not the spirit of Christianity (Lk.9:56); because our religion instructs us to leave it to Him who has said, ‘Vengeance is Mine.”

Elijah wasn’t a civil authority.  Yet he made the decision to kill the false prophets without having the authorization to kill/stone false prophets (cf. De.18:20, 13:6-11).  The Lord didn’t tell him to kill them.  Elijah chose to kill them…with the sword.  1Ki.19:1 “He had killed all the prophets with the sword.”

1Ki.19:2-3 after slaying the prophets, Elijah fled for his life in fear.  He escaped from evil queen Jezebel.

However, 900 years later John the Baptizer died by the sword, at the behest of evil queen Herodias!  ref Mk.6:17-29v.27 the king’s executioner had John “beheaded in the prison”.

Elijah, as John, eventually reaped what he’d sowed!  Ga.6:7 Paul wrote, “Whatever a man sows, this he will also reap”.  Cause and effect.  Elijah killed with the sword…John the Baptizer died by the sword.  Mt.26:52 Jesus said, “All who take up the sword will perish by the sword”.  What goes around, comes around.  Oba.1:15 “As you have done, it will be done to you.”  Ps.7:16 “His violence shall come down upon the crown of his own head.”  Barnes Notes Ps.7:16 “He’d be treated as he had designed to treat others.”  God is just.  Karma?  John reaped the payback for Elijah’s unauthorized ruthless treatment of the false prophets.  Although Jezebel failed to kill Elijah, Herodias succeeded in having him/John slain.

Jesus said John the Baptizer was Elijah.  Jn.1:21 but John didn’t think he was Elijah.  It seems that God mercifully causes amnesia to set in before or by the time children mature.  So a person (like John) isn’t tormented with guilt from any memory of his previous life when he’d committed major crimes or sins.

Elijah was considered a great prophet.  In the Hebrew Bible (Tanakh), Moses typified the Law and Elijah typified the Prophets…the “Law and the Prophets”.  And in Lk.7:28, Jesus said there’s no greater prophet than John/(Elijah)!  Mt.17:3-4, 10-13 in the Transfiguration, Moses and Elijah appeared with Jesus.  The representatives of the Law and the Prophets were two witnesses to Messiah Jesus’ upcoming death (Lk.9:30-31).  Note that the Transfiguration occurred after John the Baptizer was beheaded (back in Mt.14:10).  Elijah couldn’t have been present in the Transfiguration if John was still alive in Judea.

The commission given to John the Baptizer as “My messenger” (Mal.3:1, Is.40:3 & Mk.1:2-4) came to pass in the 1st century AD, although unconverted Jews still don’t think John was the prophesied Elijah.

Rebirth to physical life was a common belief in Bible times.  Elijah was expected to personally appear on the scene.  Philo Judaeus (ca 20 BC – 50 AD) wrote of the Lógos (Greek), the Word of God.  Works of Philo: The Special Laws 1, p.541 “Now the image of God is the Logos [Word], by which all the world was made.”  The apostle John affirmed in Jn.1:1-4, 14, all things came into being through the primordial Logos/Word who became Jesus in the flesh.  Philo preceded the apostle John.

Philo also wrote in On Dreams 1:138-139, “Now of souls some descend upon the earth with a view to be bound in mortal bodies. Of these, those which are influenced by a desire for mortal life, and familiarized to it, again return to it.”  According to Philo, some Jews returned to a physical life and others didn’t.  (This wasn’t the false New Age belief of transmigration of souls into lower animal bodies!)

Josephus Antiquities of the Jews 18:1:3-5Pharisees believe souls have an immortal rigor, and under the earth [cf. Paul’s Php.2:10] there will be rewards or punishments. Virtuous souls have the power to revive and live again, the vicious to be detained….The doctrine of the Sadducees is that souls die with the body…The Essenes teach immortality of souls and esteem that the rewards of righteousness are to be earnestly striven for.”  Pharisees & Essenes thought there was life after death.  Paul had been a Pharisee.

Roman author Pliny (23–79 AD) wrote admirably of the Essenes.  Biblical Archaeology Review Spring 2020, p.49 quotes Pliny. “So fruitful for them [Essenes] is the repentance which others feel for their past lives. Natural History 5:17:4.

Jews who encountered Jesus thought He too had lived previously.  Some mistakenly thought Jesus was the expected Elijah to come, or that Jesus was John the Baptizer reincarnated.  Mk.6:14-16 “People were saying, ‘John the Baptist has risen from the dead, and that is why these miraculous powers are at work in Him [Jesus].’ But others were saying, ‘He is Elijah.’ When Herod heard of it, he kept saying, ‘John, who I beheaded, has risen!”  Evidently Herod didn’t hold to the Sadducean doctrine of no resurrection.

Others thought Jesus was an Old Testament prophet (other than Elijah) returned to life.  Jesus asked His disciples in Mt.16:13-14, “Who do people say the Son of Man is?’ They answered Him, ‘Some say John the Baptist, others say Elijah, and others Jeremiah or one of the Prophets.”  Some of Jesus’ countrymen thought He was Jeremiah (lived ca 650–570 BC) physically alive again.  Why Jeremiah?  Jeremiah had prophesied of the future Messiah (Je.23:5-6) and New Covenant (Je.31:31-ff).  Both Jeremiah and Jesus were persecuted by Jewish leaders who opposed them (cf. Je.20:7-10).  JFB Commentary Mt.16:14 “Jeremiah…suggested by a supposed resemblance between the ‘man of sorrows’ [Is.53:3 Messiah] and the ‘weeping prophet’ [Je.9:1, 13:17]?”  Jeremiah’s book of “Lamentations” means “weeping”.  So it is perhaps understandable why some would (wrongly) think Jesus & Jeremiah were the same human spirit.

Jn.9:1-3 Jesus’ disciples asked Jesus about the man born blind from birth.  “His disciples asked Him, ‘Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents that he should be born blind?’ Jesus answered, ‘Neither this man nor his parents, but in order that the works of God might be displayed in him.”  Jesus then displayed the works of God by miraculously giving sight to this man.

We understand, a human embryo or fetus in the womb doesn’t commit sin.  Jesus’ disciples assumed the man sinned in a past life and his blindness in this life was the payback; he was reaping what he’d sowed.  Or else the man’s blindness was caused by some sin committed by his parents.  Jn.9:34 Pharisees who opposed Jesus accused this man of being “born entirely in sin”.  Although sin wasn’t the cause with this man, Jesus didn’t tell His disciples that a person couldn’t have sinned in a prior physical body.

Gill Exposition Jn.9:2 “The disciples asked whether this man had sinned in a pre-existent state when in another body. This notion, Josephus says, was embraced by the Pharisees.”  Barnes Notes “Many of the Jews believed…that the soul of a man, in consequence of sin, might be compelled into other bodies, and be punished there.”  The nature of the past life sins may not be capital crimes or wholly evil.  Ellicott Commentary ties Jn.9:2 to the apocrypha book Wisdom of Solomon 8:20. “Being rather good, I came into a body undefiled” (KJV 1611 edition).  He’d been more good than evil; his rebirth body had no congenital defects.  (In Mt.12:42, Jesus referred to the “wisdom of Solomon” 6:1.)  Jesus didn’t tell His disciples that belief in a rebirth from a mother’s womb (as Job believed, Jb.1:21) was erroneous.

Jn.5:28-29 Jesus said that from the graves there is resurrection to eternal Life (Strongs g2222, Greek) for those who did good, and resurrection to judgment for those who didn’t.  Judgment involves evaluation.  Ac.24:15 Paul said there shall be “a resurrection of both the just and the unjust”.  Cambridge Bible Jn.5:29 “This passage and Ac.24:15 are the only direct assertions in the New Testament of a bodily resurrection of the wicked.”  (also cf. Da.12:2 with Je.23:40.)

He.11:35 a resurrection to eternal Life with a spiritual body is better than resuscitation, and better than resurrection to another physical life.  1Co.15:44 that which is planted a natural physical body is raised a spiritual body.  Paul is referring to the just who believed, repented, and lived by the Holy Spirit.  (see “Life and Death – for Saints”.)  The just were “firstfruits” (Ja.1:18, Re.14:4), rising to eternal Life.  The just who sowed good works reap a spiritual body to be with the Lord.

He.9:27 all die at least once physically.  cf. deaths: He.11:35, Jn.11:44, 1Ki.17:22, 2Ki.4:35.  Re.20:14 a second death which terminates consciousness is indicated for the very few.  (see “Gehenna (2) – Lake of Unquenched Fire”.)  Yet based upon God’s principle of justice seen in De.19:21, “life for life”…there wouldn’t be a second death without a second life preceding it!  To hear the name Jesus, believe, repent.

Alfred Edersheim The Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah, p.1064 “It is at least conceivable that there may be a purification or transformation of all who are capable of such…and that in the end of what we call time, only that which is morally incapable of transformation, be it men or devils, shall be cast into the lake of fire and brimstone.”  (Also, some few view the lake of fire as a refiner’s fire of purification.)

So what do the scriptures reflect will be the final result when every human, BC and AD, has had ample opportunity to hear of salvation via Jesussacrifice, and time to show belief and repentance from sin?

Re.5:11-14 “And every [g3956] created thing – which is in heaven, on the earth, under the earth, in the sea, and all [g3956] that are in them – I heard saying ‘To the One who sits on the throne, and to the Lamb [Jesus], be blessing and honor and glory and dominion to the ages of the ages. Amen.”  Ellicott Commentary Re.5:13 “The whole universe joins in this grand acclaim.”  Barnes Notes “Ascribing praise. All worlds seem to join in it.”  JFB Commentary “The universal chorus of creation.”  Every creature.

So this is total.  At this time all will worship, giving honor and praise to the Lord.  This is done of their own free will.  2Ti.1:10 Jesus has “abolished death”!  There are none left in a hell agony, resisting God!

John envisioned in Re.21:1, 4 “I saw a new heaven and a new earth; for the first heaven and earth had ceased to exist. He [God] shall wipe away every tear from their eyes; and death will not exist any more; or mourning or crying or pain; for the former things have ceased to exist.”  There’s no cries of pain & torment from a hell-fire!  Gill Exposition Re.21:4 “There will be nothing to afflict the mind.”

What great news this is in regards to our ancestors, family members, friends & loved ones who died unconverted/unsaved!  Their ultimate fate isn’t eternal conscious torment in hell!  The same goes for “all Israel” (not just a remnant).  And for the unnamed multitudes who lived in BC times.  God is so good!

Needless to say, Christians should hope that Universal Salvation for all through Jesus will eventually be a reality in the ages to come.  God’s loving, impartial plan for mankind, created in His image, is greater than we’ve thought!  Praise the Lord!

Jesus’ Twelve Apostles

Jesus’ original twelve apostles and their work are evident throughout the New Testament (NT).  There are different names associated with His apostles.  My main purpose here is to identify who they were.

An apostle is one sent out, an envoy or an ambassador.  Jesus commissioned His disciples (followers or devotees) as apostles and authorized them to act as His representatives.  Mt.10:1 “He gave them authority over unclean spirits, to cast them out, and to heal every kind of disease and sickness.”

They were eyewitnesses of His resurrection (Lk.24:33-43, Jn.20:26-28).  He instructed them to go out to the world, preach the gospel, teach the nations, and baptize believers (Mt.28:19, Mk.16:15-16).  Jesus told them in Ac.1:8, “You shall receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you; and you shall be My witnesses in Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria, and to the ends of the earth”.  His apostles and prophets are the foundation of God’s church, with Christ Himself the Chief Cornerstone (Ep.2:19-20).

The twelve apostles are listed in Mt.10:2-4, Mk.3:14-19, Lk.6:13-16.  After Jesus’ ascension, eleven of them are seen in the upper room of Ac.1:13.  All twelve were Jews.

Mt.10:2-4 “The names of the twelve are these: Simon who is called Peter, and Andrew his brother; James (the son) of Zebedée, and John his brother; Philip and Bar-tholomew, Thomas and Matthew the tax collector; James (the son) of Alpháeus, and Thaddáeus [Lebbáeus]; Simon the Cananéan [zealot], and Judas Iscariót who betrayed Him.”  (Mk.3:14-19 shows the same twelve names.)

In the above, Matthew included surnames or nicknames and names of relatives to further identify and distinguish apostles from one another.  I’ll refer to Simon the Cananean/zealot as Simon, and to Simon Peter as Peter.  Jn.1:42 “Jesus looked at him and said, ‘You are Simon the son of Joannes, you shall be called Cephás (which is translated Peter).”  The English name Peter is from the Greek pétros (Strongs g4074, Greek), which means stone.  Cephas (g2786) is the Aramaic equivalent for stone.  Paul referred to Simon Peter as Cephas (1Co.1:12, 15:5, Ga.2:9, e.g.).

The name James in English comes from the Hebrew name Jacob.  I’ll use the name James, not Jacob.

The Aramaic “Bar-tholomew” means “son of Tholmai”.  In Aramaic, ‘bar’ means ‘son’.  And the Greek name for his father ‘Tholmai’ is Ptolemy.  What was the name of this apostle who was the son of Tholmai/Ptolemy?  Most think Tholmai’s son is the Nathanaél of Jn.1:45-49 & 21:2.  John never mentions a Bar-tholomew.  Whereas in Matthew, Mark and Luke we don’t see the name Nathanael.  He is the Bar-tholomew of Mt.10:3, Mk.3:18, Lk.6:14, Ac.1:13.  Tholmai’s son the apostle was Nathanael.

All twelve were from Galilee, except probably Judas Iscariot.  Keriót was a town in Judea (Jsh.15:25).  Judas Iscariot was the traitor who betrayed Jesus (Lk.22:3-6, 47-48), and then hung himself (Mt.27:1-5).

The first six disciples called by Jesus were: the brothers Andrew & Peter, the brothers James & John, Philip, Nathanael/Bar-tholomew (Mat.4:18-22, Jn.1:37-51).  Andrew had been a disciple of John the Baptizer (Jn.1:40).  Andrew and Philip are Greek names…Andréas and Phílippos.  Andrew and Philip were Hellenists, Greek-speaking Jews from “Galilee of the gentiles”, Mt.4:15.  (The first Jewish Christian martyr was the Hellenist Stephen in Jerusalem, Ac.6:1-5.)  Jn.12:20-22 “Certain Greeks said to Philip, ‘Sir, we would like to see Jesus.’ Philip told Andrew; then Andrew and Philip told Jesus.”  They could speak Greek.

James & John, the sons of Zebedee, were called the “Sons of Thunder” by Jesus (Mk.3:17).  James & John were the sons of Salóme.  Identifying her at the crucifixion: Mt.27:56 the mother of the sons of Zebedee; Mk.15:40 (and 16:1) Salome; Jn.19:25 Jesus’ mother’s sister.  Regarding Salome’s identity, see Meyer NT Commentary, Cambridge Bible Note, Ellicott Commentary, Expositor’s Greek Testament, Pulpit Commentary, for Jn.19:25.  Salome was the sister of Jesus’ mother Mary.  (Biological sisters wouldn’t both be named “Mary”.)  Salome was Jesus’ aunt, making Zebedee His uncle.  Zebedee’s sons, James & John, were Jesus’ first cousins.  Salome, being Jesus’ aunt, was bold to request that her two sons receive preferential treatment in the Kingdom (Mt.20:20-24).  Jesus was closest to James & John, and Peter (ref Mt.17:1-9 Transfiguration, Mt.26:37, Mk.5:37).

In Mt.10:2-4, the first seven apostles were probably fishermen: the brothers Peter & Andrew, the brothers James & John, Philip, Bar-tholomew/Nathanael, Thomas.  Jn.21:2 “There were together Simon Peter, and Thomas called Dídymus, and Nathanael of Caná in Galilee, and the sons of Zebedee, and two other of His disciples.”  The other two were probably Peter’s brother Andrew and their close associate Philip.  Jn.1:44 “Philip was from Bethsaidá, the town of Andrew and Peter.”  Gill Exposition Jn.21:2 “Two other of his disciples; are thought to be Andrew and Philip; which is very likely, since they were both of Bethsaida.”  Bethsaida was a fishing village near the shore of the Sea of Galilee.

In Jn.2:1-12, the groom of the wedding at Cana in Galilee is thought to have been either Nathanael or Simon the Cananean/zealot.  The Greek term is zelotés (g2208).  Jacobus de Voragine The Golden Legend “Zelotes is the equivalent of Cana, because cana means zeal.”  St. Athanasius Orthodox Church literature: “According to tradition, Simon the Zealot was born in Cana of Galilee, just like Nathanael (Jn.21:2), and was the bridegroom at the wedding feast at Cana. Mary’s prominence at his wedding suggests that they may have been distantly related.”  The New Theological Movement “St. Simon, ‘the Canaanite’ not from Canaan and ‘the Zealot’ who was no Zealot [1st century Jewish Nationalist political party]. Indeed, the name ‘Canaanite’ is closely related to the Hebrew word for ‘zealous.”  The so-called ‘commandment of Mary’ spoken in Jn.2:3-5 indicates that Jesus’ mother Mary and the groom could have been related.

It is assumed the apostle Thomas was from Galilee.  The Aramaic name Taumá/Thomas means twin”.  Its counterpart in Greek is Didymus, meaningtwin”.  Jn.11:16 RSVThomas, called the Twin [Didymus g1324], said to his fellow disciples….”  The identity of Thomas’ twin is uncertain.

Eusebius (265–340 AD), church historian and bishop of Caesárea, “After the ascension of Jesus, Judas, who is also called Thomas, sent to him Thaddaeus, an apostle”.  Eusebius said that Thomas was a man named Judas, who was called Thomas/Didymus/twin.  The non-canonical Gospel of Thomas (of 200 AD?) begins with, “These are the secret sayings which the living Jesus spoke, and which Didymus Judas Thomas wrote down”.  If Eusebius and Syriac tradition are correct, this apostle’s name was Judas, and his surname or nickname was Thomas/Didymus (twin).  see “Jesus Wasn’t Thomas’ Twin”.

Matthew was a tax collector in Capernaúm (cf. Mt.4:13, 9:1, 9), located on the NW shore of the Sea of Galilee.  He was the “Levi, sitting in the tax office”.  cf. Mk.2:14 & Mt.9:9, Lk.5:27-29.  Since he was called Levi, it is thought Matthew was a Levite.  Descendants of Aaron among the Levites were priests.  So Matthew may have even been of priestly lineage.  He was (the son) of Alphaeus.  Tax collectors or customs agents were wealthy.  Customs and road tolls were collected at his customs post.  Tax collectors were often dishonest and disliked by the populace (e.g. Mt.21:31, Lk.19:1-8).  In his position, Matthew would have spoken both Aramaic and Greek.  The book of Matthew often quotes from the Old Greek version (became the Septúagint/LXX) of the Old Testament.

From Mt.10:2-4, there are two more apostles to identify.  They are James (the son) of Alphaeus, and Thaddaeus/Lebbaeus.  It is uncertain whether or not Mathew/Levi and this James were sons of the same Alphaeus.  To distinguish this James from the James & John who were sons of Zebedee, this James is often identified as James (the son) of Alphaeus (in Mt.10:3, Mk.3:18, Lk.6:15, Ac.1:13).  At the cross, Mark also refers to this James as “James the Less” in Mk.15:40. “There were also women looking on from a distance among whom were Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James the Less and Josés, and Salome.”  In Mk.16:1, the same three women brought spices to Jesus’ tomb.  Matthew refers to the mother of James (the son) of Alphaeus, James the Less, as the “other Mary” in Mt.27:61 & 28:1.  (No gospel writer shows Jesus’ mother Mary at His tomb.)  James of Alphaeus is James the Less.

Thaddaeus/Lebbaeus is named in Mt.10:3 and Mk.3:18.  However, Luke doesn’t include Thaddaeus among the apostles in Lk.6:13-16 or Ac.1:13.  Instead, Luke includes Judas of James.  In Lk.6:14-16, Luke lists “Simon Peter & Andrew, James & John, Philip, Bar-tholomew, Matthew, Thomas, James of Alphaeus, Simon the zealot, Judas of James, Judas Iscariot.  Luke lists the same names in Ac.1:13. “Peter, John, James, Andrew, Philip, Thomas, Bar-tholomew, Matthew, James (the son) of Alphaeus, Simon the zealot, Judas of James.”  (Missing is Judas Iscariot, who’d committed suicide.)

Comparing Mt.10:2-4, Mk.3:14-19, Lk.6:13-16, Ac.1:13…it appears that Thaddaeus/Lebbaeus (means ‘large-hearted’) and Judas of James are the same apostle.  Judas/Thaddaeus was the brother (or son) of James of Alphaeus/James the Less.  Pulpit Commentary Lk.6:16 “There is no doubt that Lebbaeus and Thaddaeus were surnames by which James’s Jude, or Judas, was known generally in the Church.”  Matthew Poole Commentary Lk.6:13 “Judas the brother of James, by Luke; (this was the penman of the Epistle of Jude).”

In Jn.14:22, John referred to this Judas as “Judas (not Iscariot)”.  Barnes Notes Jn.14:22 “This was the same as Lebbeus or Thaddeus. See Mat 10:3. He was the brother of James, and the author of the Epistle of Jude.”  Pulpit Commentary Jn.14:22 “The Lebbaeus, or Thaddaeus, of Mk.3:18 and Mt.10:3; the Judas brother of James of Lk.6:16 and Ac.1:13.”  (John refers to Thomas as Thomas.)

So there were three apostles named Judas.  Thaddaeus the brother of James, Thomas, Iscariot.  Ac.1:13 & Lk.6:14-16 show that Thomas and Judas/Thaddeus and Judas Iscariot were three different people.  Traditionally, Thomas and Judas/Thaddeus and Judas Iscariot died in three different countries.  All occurrences of the name “Judas” in the NT are Strongs g2455.  All occurrences of “James” are g2385.

Jude 1:1 “Jude [Judas g2455], a servant of Jesus Christ and brother of James.”  Jude/Judas identifies himself as the brother of James.  Gill Exposition Jude 1:1 “Jude, the servant of Jesus Christ….The author of this epistle is the same who is elsewhere called Judas, Lk.6:16, who was one of the twelve apostles of Christ, whose name was also Lebbaeus, and whose surname was Thaddaeus. Brother of James; not the son of Zebedee, but of Alphaeus, Mt.10:2.”  JFB Commentary Jude 1:1 “Jude. He was also called Lebbaeus and Thaddaeus (Mt.10:3), probably to distinguish him from Judas Iscariot.”

Let’s look more closely at this James, the brother of Jude/Judas (not Iscariot).  He can be traced by the order seen in Luke’s gospel & Acts.  In Lk.5:10, Luke first mentions a James, and links him with John as the sons of Zebedee.  In Lk.6:14-16, Luke again mentions James & John, and then a James of Alphaeus (and a Judas of James, distinguished from Judas Iscariot).  So James of Alphaeus is a second James.  In Lk.8:51, 9:28, 54 we see the brothers James & John again.  In Lk.24:10, Luke mentions Mary (the mother) of James, but there’s no John here.  So this Mary relates to the James who Luke identified as James of Alphaeus, not John’s brother James.  Continuing with Luke’s book of Acts….

In Ac.1:13, Luke distinguishes James & John from James of Alphaeus.  So far, Luke’s writings have identified only two apostles named James.  Then in Ac.12:2, Herod had James the brother of John killed.  Several verses later, in Ac.12:17, Peter said, “Go show these things to James and the brethren”.  In v.17, Peter isn’t referring to James the brother of John…that James had died back in v.2.  The only other James identified by Luke in his gospel and Acts is…James of Alphaeus.  So Luke just calls him “James” from Ac.12:17 on.  This James was very well-known.  Ac.15:13 “After they held their peace, James answered.”  James of Alphaeus remains.  Ac.21:18 “Paul went in with us to James, and all the elders were present.”  James of Alphaeus.  Luke identified only two named James, not three.

This James of Alphaeus (James the Less) was related to…the apostle “Judas of James” (Lk.6:16, Ac.1:13, Jude 1:1), a brother Joses/Joseph (Mt.27:56, Mk.15:40, 47), his mother Mary of James/Mary of Clopás (Lk.24:10, Jn.19:25).  She’s the “other Mary” (Mt.27:61, 28:1).  Pulpit Commentary Mk.15:40 “The mother of our Lord had been there until the time when, having with St. John crept as near the cross of Jesus as she might venture, she was consigned by our Lord to St. John’s care, and taken away by him.”  (Again, Jesus’ mother Mary wasn’t at His tomb.)  This esteemed James was related to the Judas who wrote the epistle of Jude 1:1. “Jude, brother of James.”  Ellicott Commentary Jude 1:1 “James the Just…first bishop of Jerusalem.”    

Hippólytus (170–235 AD) On the Twelve Apostles of Christ “And James the son of Alphaeus, when preaching in Jerusalem was stoned to death by the Jews, and was buried there beside the temple.”

Papias of Hierópolis (70–160 AD) Exposition of the Sayings of the Lord, Fragment X “(1) Mary the mother of the Lord; (2) Mary the wife of Cleophas or Alphaeus, who was the mother of James the bishop and apostle, and of Simon and Thaddeus [Judas/Jude], and of one Joses; (3) ….Salome, wife of Zebedee, mother of John & James; (4) Mary Magdalene. These four are found in the Gospel.”

The sons of Zebedee/Salome, James & John, were Jesus’ cousins.  Mark and Matthew made reference to other of Jesus’ relatives.  Mk.6:3 “James and Joses and Judas and Simon.”  Mt.13:55-56 James, Joseph, Simon, Judas.  Joses/Joseph is also linked to James the Less in Mk.15:40, 47.  And it’s more than coincidental that three of Jesus’ twelve apostles were: James (the Less, of Alphaeus), Judas (of James, called Thaddaeus), Simon (the Cananean/zealot)!

Jacobus de Voragine op. cit. “Simon the Cananean and Jude, also called Thaddeus, were brothers of James the Less and sons of Mary of Cleopas, who was married to Alpheus.”  Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America “Some say that James was a nephew of Joseph, and the son of his brother Cleopas, who was also called Alphaeus and Mary his wife….But he was still called, according to the idiom of the scriptures, the Lord’s brother because of their kinship.”  Eusebius Church History 3:11 “Hegésippus records that Clopas was a brother of Joseph.”  Gill Exposition Lk.24:18 “Cleophas or Alphaeus, for it is the same name; he was one of the 70 disciples, and father of the Apostles James and Jude, and brother to Joseph, the husband of Mary, the mother of Christ.”  In that case, the “other Mary”, Mary of Alphaeus/Clopas, was sister-in-law to Jesus’ mother Mary.

It’s speculated that Alphaeus or Clopas was the deceased brother of Jesus’ (legal) father Joseph.  That Joseph had levirate married Alphaeus’ widow, the “other Mary”, to provide legacy & support (De.25:5-6).  If so, then James the Less, Judas, Simon, Joses…were Jesus’ cousins and step-brothers both.

Lastly, in Ac.1:21-26, two men were nominated to replace Judas Iscariot as an apostolic eyewitness of Jesus’ resurrection.  Matthías was chosen by lot.  The name of the other nominee was JosephMatthew Poole Commentary Ac.1:23 “Joseph, or Joses, the same name called.”  Barnes Notes Ac.1:23 “Lightfoot supposes that he [Joseph] was the son of Alpheus and brother of James the Less.”  Joses the relative?

After the replacement of Judas Iscariot in Ac.1:26, the twelve apostles were: Simon Peter & Andrew, James & John (sons of Zebedee), Philip, Bar-tholomew/Nathanael, Thomas/Didymus/(Judas), Matthew/Levi, James of Alphaeus called James the Less or just James, Thaddaeus/Lebbaeus/Judas of James, Simon the Cananean/zealot, Matthias.  Their witness?  It is true…the Lord Jesus lives (Re.1:18)!

Sabbath Day Became Sunday in Rome

This topic traces the church’s transition from meeting on the 7th day sábbath to Sunday observance during the early centuries AD.  What factors led to the change?

Ge.2:1-3 “God blessed the 7th day and made it holy.”  He sanctified His 7th day cessation as holy time!  The vast majority of people today are unaware that since Creation a specific day of holy time comes & goes each week.  All things were created by Jesus the Word (Col.1:16, Jn.1:1-3, 14).  Jesus said the weekly sabbath was made for man, and He as Creator is Lord of the sabbath (Mk.2:27-28)!  Since Jesus said the sabbath rest was made for man, it is illogical to assume that God withheld knowledge of the sabbath day from man for millennia until the time of Moses!  (see the “Sabbath 7th Day” series.)

We read in the New Testament (NT) that the saints of the apostolic church assembled together.  Originally the NT church was a gathering of people…it wasn’t the building where they met!  The Greek term rendered “church” is ekklésia, Strongs g1577; it occurs 118 times in the NT.

Lk.4:16 it was Jesus’ custom to attend the formal style of service of His day at synagogue (g4864) on the sabbath (g4521 sábbaton).  This custom resulted from the instruction God gave to Moses in Le.23:3. “On the 7th day there is a sabbath of complete rest, a holy convocation. It is a sabbath to the Lord in all your dwellings.”  “Sabbathis a holy day/period of cessation from certain activities.

But Jesus said His followers would become persecuted in synagogues, and eventually would have to leave them to avoid persecution.  Jn.16:2 “They will make you outcasts from the synagogue.”

Mt.18:15-20 Jesus authorized His own future assemblies or messianic Beit Din (‘House of Judgment’) with elders overseeing decisions…to “bind and loose” (forbid and permit), Mt.16:19.  Two or three local elders helped resolve internal disputes and made legal decisions for each local congregation.  Jewish synagogues were lay institutions with unpaid elders (zakén h2205, Hebrew).  Some Jewish Christians would call their own assemblies “synagogues” g4864, as James wrote in Ja.2:2.

But Jesus said church leaders aren’t to be lords (Mt.20:25-28).  Jesus is Lord (2Jn.1:3).  He is the ‘architect’ of His assembly (Mt.16:18)!  He died and rose again, and His NT church began in Acts 2.

All the earliest converts were Jewish Christians/Messianic Jews.  Then Ac.8:1-5, there was persecution at Jerusalem and a scattering (to Judea & Samaria) in the aftermath of Stephen’s martyrdom.

Then in Acts 10, uncircumcised gentiles (Cornelius et al) received the Holy Spirit too.

In Acts 13, Paul (Saul) went out evangelizing with Barnábas.  They went first to synagogues.  Eight synagogues are named in the NT where Paul is at synagogue.  Ac.13:14, 43-48 nearly all the people (Jews and gentiles) at Pisidían Antioch in Galatia went to synagogue on the sabbath day to hear Paul speak.  Paul said the gospel should be preached to the Jew first (cf. Ac.1:8).  Paul’s custom (and Jesus’ custom) was to attend synagogue on the sabbath day, ref Ac.17:1-2, 18:1, 4.

In Phílippi of Macedonia there were few Jews and no synagogue.  Yet Paul and Luke still worshiped on the sabbath day by the riverside with a few people to whom they could share the gospel, Ac.16:12-15!

Again, Jesus Himself attended synagogue on the sabbath day.  Lk.23:55-56 a few hours after Jesus died, the loyal Galilean women who witnessed His crucifixion “rested on the sabbath according to the commandment” (ref Ex.20:8-11).  The Jewish people (including Paul) have perpetuated the sabbath time God ordained at Creation.  The church emerged from this sabbath and synagogue background.  see the topic “Synagogue Influence on the Church”.

The gospel is also for gentiles, non-Jews (e.g. Ac.15:7-8).  Early-on these gentiles were God-fearers who frequented the synagogues (periphery of) on the sabbath day, Ac.13:14-16.  These God-fearers had different social customs, but believed the God of the Jews really is God! (cf. Ac.10:1-2.)

Jesus said synagogue persecution would come.  As Jewish Christians were forced out of synagogues, and the gospel spread into gentile areas, local assemblies with Jewish & gentile Christians together were raised up.  For various reasons, many of them began meeting after the sabbath day ended at sunset (Saturday evening), or on Sunday.  The reasons follow:

Earliest Christianity was viewed as another sect of Judaism.  Ac.24:5 Paul was a leader in the sect of the Nazarenes, Jewish Christians.  (see “Jewish Sects of the 1st Century”.)

But near the end of the 1st century, disbelieving Jews added a synagogue curse, the Bírkat HaMinim, upon Jewish Christian ‘heretics’ (so-called) in synagogues.  Everett Ferguson Backgrounds of Early Christianity “Gamaliél’s grandson Gamaliel II (active 80–120 AD) introduced into the Eighteen Benedictions the curse, ‘Let the Nazarenes and the heretics perish as in a moment, let them be blotted out of the book of the living’, which effectively excommunicated Christians from synagogues and formalized the break.”  Gary Morton Theological Vignettes “Around 100 years after the death of Christ, rabbis excommunicated the Christians, leaving them out of the synagogue and the Sabbath.”

Jewish Christians refused to recite the curse (against themselves), and quit the synagogues.  Marriage and forms of commerce with Christians became prohibited by Jews!

After the Jerusalem temple was destroyed in 70 AD, the Jewish temple tax was replaced by the fiscus judaicus tax of Emperor Vespasian (69–79 AD).  Jews paid it to the heathen temple of Jupiter Capitolinus!  Emperor Domitian (81–96 AD) broadened the levy to include other people who observed Jewish customs or lived like Jews.  (The tax continued until 360 AD.)

But if Christianity became a separate religion from Judaism…it wouldn’t be subject to the tax!  That’s what occurred.  Christianity became separate, no longer considered a sect of Judaism.

Lawrence Schiffman Christianity Parting of the Ways “The emperor Nerva (96–98 CE) freed the Christians (probably including the Jewish Christians) from paying the fiscus judaicus, the tax decreed as a punishment in the aftermath of the [Jewish] revolt of 66–73 CE. The Romans now regarded the Christians in general as a separate group.”

This discriminatory tax, paid to a pagan god, motivated gentile Christians to quit Jewish customs.  The customs included meeting on God’s 7th day sabbath.  Historically, there was racial bias & animosity between Jews and gentiles anyway (ref Ac.11:2, 21:28).  Ingrained differences existed.  In any event….

Jewish and gentile Christians began the practice of meeting after the sabbath ended at sunset, or on Sundaydistinguishing them from hostile disbelieving Jews who met in synagogues on the 7th day!

Also a factor in Sun-day meetings was the association of Jesus with the sun.  In scripture, Jesus is the prophesied “Sun of Righteousness” (Mal.4:2), and the symbolic “Sunrise from on high” (Lk.1:78).  Furthermore, Christ rose from the dead on a Sunday.  Commemorating the day of the week on which Jesus was resurrected became a primary reason for traditional Sunday observance over the centuries.

However, the 1st day/Sunday isn’t referred to as ‘Resurrection Day’ in scripture.  That doesn’t appear until later writings.  Jesus didn’t designate worship of Him or rest on a Resurrection Day or Sundays!  Rather, that’s man’s tradition.  God never commanded in scripture Sunday/1st day observance as a sabbath.  The leading NT apostles, Peter-John-Paul, didn’t try to change 7th day holy time to Sunday!  Of note, Sunday isn’t mentioned in 1Clement, written from Rome to Corinth in the late 1st century.

The Epistle of Barnabas, of uncertain authorship, is dated ca 100 AD.  It posits that the 7th millennium fulfills God’s 7th day sabbath rest.  Barn.15:9-10 “The 8th day, that is, the beginning of the other world. In which cause we observe the 8th day with gladness, in which Jesus rose from the dead.”  It advocates commemorating the eschatological 8th day on the 1st day of each week.  However, this epistle contains bias against Jews.  Graham Harter The ‘Letter of Barnabas’ “There is a definite undercurrent of hostility towards the Jewish people.”  Joe Watts Thoughts on Barnabas’s Epistle “Barnabas is stating that everything from Moses to Jesus is simply wrong. Barnabas several times says the covenant is ours (i.e. Christians) and not the Jews.”  Barnabas’ error contradicts Je.31:31 & He.8:8, which clearly states the New Covenant is with Israel/Judah.  Regardless of bias, Barnabas indicates Sunday meetings had begun.

The gentile Justin Martyr (100–165 AD) noted to a Jew in Dialogue With Tryphon XVI, “Cursing in your synagogues them that believe in Christ”.  Justin First Apology, Ch 68 (ca 150 AD) “But Sunday is the day on which we hold our common assembly, because it is the first day of the week and Jesus our savior on the same day rose from the dead.”  Sunday meetings were becoming widespread by 150 AD.

Also Sunday meetings attracted heathens from old sunworship (ref Ezk.8:16, Jb.31:26-28, 2Ki.23:5, 11, De.4:19) and from Míthraism.  Usage of the 7-day planetary week grew in the 1st century.  (However, ancient Israelites and the Jews based their 7-day week on Ge.1:1–2:3 & Ex.16:22-30, and the Assyrians also had a 7-day week.)  The good news that Jesus died for the sins of the whole world (Jn.4:42) was accepted by non-Godfearers who’d viewed blood sacrifices as pleasing to their many heathen gods, 1Co.8:5 & 10:20.  (also see “Evangelism in the Apostolic Church”.)

The desire to attract pagans to Jesus led to more Sunday worship.  But this isn’t to say that all heathen gentiles as Christians worshiped the sun on Sun-day.  However, as these pagans came into the church, some of their past festive practices and art became assimilated…e.g. sun-disks, mistletoe, wass-ale-ing.

Pagan practices added to tensions between Jewish and gentile Christians, past idolators.  Gentiles BC had been viewed as outsiders, distinct from Jews.  (see “Gentiles’ in the Bible”.)  Racism existed.  The church gradually split into Jewish and gentile factions.  Gentiles began to outnumber Jews in the church.

In addition to persecution from disbelieving Jews (in and out of synagogues), Christians suffered persecutions from the heathen Roman Empire on-and-off for approximately 300 years.

In 274 AD, Roman Emperor Aurélian made the ‘Invincible Sun’ the official protector of the Empire!

Then in 312 AD, Emperor Constantine accepted a form of Christianity!  Christianity was formally recognized as a religion in 313 AD at Milan.  As a political move, Constantine instituted Sunday rest in his edict of 321 AD. “On the venerable day of the sun let the magistrates and people in cities rest.”  Although he was supposedly converted in 312 AD, Constantine still venerated the Sun/Sol in 321 AD.  Wikipedia: Sol Invictus “Constantine’s official coinage continues to bear images of Sol until 325 AD. His triumphal arch was carefully positioned to align with the colossal statue of Sol by the Colosseum.”

Sylvester I was Pope (314–335 AD) during Constantine’s reign.  “The same pope [Sylvester I] decreed that the rest of the sabbath should be transferred to the Lord’s Day [Sunday].”  Quoted by Rábanus Máurus (776–856 AD), archbishop of Mainz, Germany in De Clericorum Institutione (On the Institution of the Clergy), bk. 2, chap. 46, in MPL, Vol. 107, col 361. Trans. from the Latin.

Eusebius (264–340 AD), bishop of Caesárea and court theologian for Constantine, wrote in his 338 AD Commentary on the Psalms, (Ps.92) Vol. 23, cols 1171-2. “All things whatsoever that it was the duty to do on the Sabbath, we have transferred to the Lord’s Day.”  Rome and the churchmenmade this changeNot God!  Pressure from Rome and ‘the Church’ led to increased Sunday observance.

At the 363 AD Council of Laodicea, sabbath observance was officially banned. “Christians shall not Judaize by resting on the Sabbath, but must work on that day, rather honoring the Lord’s Day, resting then.”  To an increasing extent, the 7th day sabbath had become changed to Sunday!

In the Edict of Thessalonica of 380 AD, Christianity became the state religion of the Roman Empire.

Later, Pope Gregory 1 even associated sabbath day rest with Antichrist!  He wrote in 597 AD, Letters 13:1 “It has come to my ears that certain men of perverse spirit have sown among you some things that are wrong and opposed to the holy faith, so as to forbid any work being done on the Sabbath day. What else can I call these [men] but preachers of Antichrist.”

And yet it was Christnot Anti-christ…who’d revealed His 7th day sabbath rest to Moses/Israel!  e.g. Ex.16:11-30 manna, 20:8-11 keep the sabbath day holy.  (see “Jesus Was The Old Testament God”.)

{Sidelight: It appears the NT church government was more an oligarchy, not a hierarchy.  As Peter, John & James went to the physically circumcised, Barnabas & Paul went to the uncircumcised gentiles (Ga.2:7-9).  Php.1:1 this letter was addressed also to the overseers/bishops (plural) and deacons in Philippi.  Plural bishops in one city.  In the apostolic church, there was no Pope!  The Holy Spirit is the ‘vicar of Christ’, so to speak.  The apostolic church wasn’t an indolent, immoral, corrupt monopoly.

But many Christians disregarded man’s attempt to change or ban meetings on God’s sabbath.  The 5th century church historian Scholásticus wrote in Ecclesiastical History, Bk 5, Ch 22. “Although almost all churches throughout the world celebrate the sacred mysteries [of the Lord’s Supper] on the sabbath of every week, yet the Christians of Alexandria and at Rome have ceased to do this.”  Bk 6, Ch 8 “I mean Saturday and Lord’s Day of each week, on which assemblies are usually held in the churches.”

Furthermore, his contemporary Salmínius Sozómen wrote in Ecclesiastical History, Bk 7, Ch 19. “The people of Constantinople, and almost everywhere, assemble together on the sabbath, as well as on the first day of the week, which custom is never observed at Rome or at Alexandria.”  Rome essentially changed the sabbath to Sunday!  Others have followed suit.

Peter Heylyn, The History of the Sabbath, 1613 “Ambrose, the celebrated bishop of Milan, said that when he was in Milan he observed Saturday, but when in Rome observed Sunday. This gave rise to the proverb ‘When you are in Rome, do as Rome does.”  (Ambrose lived in the latter 300s AD.)

History indicates that some Christian masters in the Roman Empire gave their slaves both Saturday and Sunday off from work.  The late 4th century Apostolic Constitutions, Bk 8, Ch 33. “Let the slaves work five days; but on the Sabbath Day and the Lord’s day let them have leisure to go to church for instruction in piety….The Sabbath is on account of the creation, and the Lord’s day of the resurrection.”

Yet the 7th day as holy time/rest remains unchanged in scripture, regardless of other meeting days!  Roman Catholic Archbishop James Gibbons admitted in The Faith of Our Fathers (1876). “You may read the Bible from Genesis to Revelation, and you will not find a single line authorizing the sanctification of Sunday. The Scriptures enforce the religious observance of Saturday, a day which we never sanctify.”  Albert Smith, Chancellor of the Archdiocese of Baltimore, replied for the cardinal in a letter of Feb 10, 1920. “If Protestants would follow the Bible, they should worship God on the Sabbath Day, that is, Saturday. In keeping Sunday they are following a law of the Catholic Church.”  Not a law of God.  (I’m not 7th Day Adventist.)  Again, ref the “Sabbath 7th Day” series.

To recap, the main reasons behind the change from the 7th day sabbath rest/observance to Sunday:

#1 Jewish Christians were forced out of synagogues which kept the sabbath; the synagogue curse was added.  #2 Rome levied the fiscus judaicus tax against those who observed Jewish customs (such as the sabbath).  #3 Prejudice between Jews and gentiles.  #4 Sunday meetings distinguished Christians from disbelieving Jews who met in synagogues on the 7th day.  #5 Since Jesus rose on a Sunday, men began the tradition of observing Sundays.  #6 Heathens accustomed to pagan sun-worship were attracted to Christianity by Sun-day meetings.  #7 Roman Emperor Aurelius made the ‘Invincible Sun’ the official protector of the Empire; Emperor Constantine accepted Christianity and mandated “rest on the venerable day of the sun” in cities.  #8 The institutional church council outlawed 7th day sabbath rest.

Thus Sunday meetings became prominent over the centuries, and through Roman Catholic Church influence.  Yet man cannot change the actual 7th day holy time sanctified by God from the beginning!  God’s word in the scriptures is authoritative, regardless of man’s traditional practices or decrees.

However, the word ‘sabbath’ means ‘cessation’…not ‘worship’, not ‘go to church’.  (Though worship and church are done on the sabbath.)  We may worship the Lord and attend church gatherings/events any or every day.  But only the 7th day sabbath is holy time, ordained by God for man at Creation.

Three Days and Three Nights, Mt.12:40

The timing of Jesus’ Last Supper, and His crucifixion & resurrection, shouldn’t cause confusion or division among Christians.  But it has.  Some have even said the only sign Jesus gave that He’s our Savior was…He’d be dead for three full days and three full nights, 72 hours!  But does a 72–hour time period fit with other relevant scriptures?  How long was Jesus dead?

The only New Testament (NT) passage which could lead to a 72–hour hypothesis is Mt.12:38-40. “Some of the scribes and Pharisees said to Him, ‘We want to see a miraculous sign from You.’ But Jesus replied, ‘An evil and adulterous generation seeks for a sign. But none shall be given to it except the sign of the prophet Jonah. For as Jonah was 3 days and 3 nights in the belly of the great fish, so shall the Son of Man be 3 days and 3 nights in the heart of the earth.”

By “3 days and 3 nights in the heart of the earth”, did Matthew mean that the sign of Jonah and of Jesus’ resurrection was…Jesus would be in the tomb for a full 72 hours?  (This topic won’t evaluate modern tales of men surviving inside a whale.)

Or perhaps we shouldn’t even address this issue.  After all, Jesus said the sign, including “3 days and 3 nights”, was given to that evil adulterous generation religiously led by the scribes and Pharisees.  The (idiomatic) “3 days and 3 nights” wasn’t given to the church!  Christ’s church isn’t those “evil” leaders to whom He spoke!  But since the issue has resulted in misunderstanding and a measure of division among some in the church, let’s proceed.

To begin, let’s see from scripture the inclusive manner by which the ancients counted days.

Acts 10 has the account of Peter’s journey from his house in Joppa to Cornelius’ house in Caesárea, approximately 40 miles distant.  v.3 Cornelius saw an angel. “About 3pm he saw an angel in a vision.”  To make the journey sequence plainer, I’ll hypothetically assign Sunday 3pm as when the vision occurred.  Then Cornelius dispatched men to send for Peter.  v.9 “About noon the next day the messengers were on their way, approaching the city.”  They’re nearing Joppa at noon Mondayv.23 “Peter invited them in and gave them lodging. And the next day he arose and went away with them.”  Peter lodged them Monday night, and Tuesday morning he left with them for Caesarea.  v.24 “The following day they entered Caesarea. Cornelius was waiting for them.”  On Wednesday they came to Cornelius’ house.

Ac.10:25-29 Peter goes inside, explains why he agreed to accompany those gentiles, and asks Cornelius why he sent for him.  Cornelius’ reply is key to our understanding the inclusive manner by which the ancients counted days!  v.30Four days ago to this same hour, 3pm, I was praying in my house and a man stood before me in shining apparel!”  Four days ago?!  But from Sunday at 3pm until Wednesday at 3pm is 72 hours…that’s only three days ago according to how we count days.  (Some translations such as Weymouth and the NIV changed v.30 to read “three days ago”, to help readers understand the actual number of elapsed days.)  But to the ancients, there were parts of four days counted: Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday (or whatever four successive days they actually were)…even though the elapsed time was only 72 hours.  Understanding this ancient scriptural manner of counting is essential!

British criminal courts count days in this manner…they include any part of one day as a whole day.

More examples of this inclusive counting: Wisdom of Solomon 7:1-2 “In my mother’s womb I was fashioned to be flesh in the time of 10 months.”  Human pregnancy is a little more than 9 months.  But according to the method of counting during Bible times, it was reckoned as 10 months.

Jn.20:26After eight days the disciples were again inside the house.”  To aid reader understanding, several translations and margins render this verse “a week later”.  Gill Exposition “After eight days. That is, the same day, a week later.”  Matthew Poole Commentary “Eight days after the resurrection, counting the day Christ rose for one.”  It’s inclusive counting.

This method of counting days is used today in Africa and parts of Asia.  Wande Abímbola Thoughts on Yoruba, p.120 “Inclusive counting. For example today is Monday, if we do something today, and we will repeat it next Monday, the Yoruba will say, ‘We are going to repeat it eight days from today,’ not seven. We would count today, and we will also count next Monday as well.”  Even in modern Africa, it’s still counted as 8 days, though only 7 days elapsed.

Another Bible incident where John counted days inclusively is Jn.11:17. “When Jesus arrived, He found that Lazarus had been in the tomb four days.”  We saw in Acts 10…the total elapsed time of “four days ago” was actually 72 hours, more like our three daysJFB Commentary Jn.11:17 “Four days…the first and last being incomplete.”  Meyer’s NT Commentary “Two full days and parts of two other days (the first and the fourth).”  To aid understanding, the Weymouth translation changed v.17 to read “three days”.

Jews customarily buried the dead on the day of death (Jn.19:41-42, Ac.5:5-6, 10).  Notice a few verses later in Jn.11:39. “Jesus said, ‘Take the stone away’. But Martha, the sister of the deceased, said to Him, ‘By this time there will be a stench, for he has been dead four days.”  In that climate, women wouldn’t have opened the tomb of a corpse which had decayed for 72 hours (our three days)!

But after Jesus was crucified, the women willingly went to Jesus’ tomb (in the spring)!  Lk.24:1 “On the first day of the week, at early dawn, they went to the tomb bringing the spices they had prepared.”  Ac.13:35-37 “The One whom God raised didn’t undergo decay.”  Jesus’ corpse experienced no decay.  Jesus wasn’t in the tomb anywhere near 72 hours!  Let’s see approximately how long Jesus was in the tomb.

In Ac.10:30, Cornelius told Peter that he’d seen the angel “four days ago”.  That elapsed time was 72 hours.  Peter then witnessed about Jesus in v.39-40. “God raised Him from the dead on the 3rd day.”  Paul said the same in 1Co.15:4. “He was buried and raised on the 3rd day according to the scriptures.”  Jesus said of Himself in Mk.9:31, “They shall kill Him, and the 3rd day He shall rise again”.  Several verses witness Jesus would be raised on the 3rd day or “after 3 days”, depending on your translation.

The scriptures also define what was meant by “the 3rd day” in elapsed time.  In Lk.13:32, Jesus referred to “Today and tomorrow, and the 3rd day”.  Luke shows Jesus Himself using inclusive timing!  It’s the same method of counting the Lord used back in Ex.19:10-11. “The Lord said to Moses, ‘Consecrate the people today and tomorrow, and be ready for the 3rd day. For on the 3rd day the Lord will come down on Mt. Sinai.”  Gill Exposition “Not the third day of the month, but the third day from hence.”  Traditionally, the days in that passage were Friday and Saturday, and be ready for Sunday (Pentecost)!

Le.19:6-7 is another example of this inclusive reckoning. “The sacrifice must be eaten on the same day you offer it, and the next day, but any left on the 3rd day shall be burned up.”  This inclusive counting of days, as employed in the Bible, isn’t the method used here in the USA.

Matthew 12:40 is the sole witness who relates “3 days and 3 nights” directly to Jesus.  However, Matthew is also one among others who applied “the 3rd day” timing to Jesus.  Mt.16:21 “Jesus Christ began to show that He must be killed, and be raised up on the 3rd day.”

So it may seem that Mat.12:40 contradicts Matthew elsewhere, as well as contradicting the other writers who affirm “the 3rd day” timing.  But it doesn’t, as we will see.

The sign of Jonah is also referred to in Lk.11:29-30. “An evil generation seeks for a sign. But no sign will be given to it but the sign of Jonah. For as Jonah was a sign to the Ninevites, so shall the Son of Man be to this generation.”  Archaeological findings indicate the ancient Ninevites worshiped a fish god (Dagón?).  The great fish that swallowed Jonah miraculously cast him up on the shore alive (Jnh.2:10).  Jesus rose from the dead alive.

But Luke said nothing about “3 days and 3 nights”.  If a 72-hour time frame was the only sign, Luke wouldn’t have ignored it in his (parallel) passage!  No burial is even mentioned.  And Mt.17:23, 20:19, Lk.9:22, 18:33, 24:7, 24:46 all say Jesus would rise “the 3rd day”!

The sign of Jonah was twofold: (1) The ‘resurrection’ miracle.  The fish became a widespread symbol or secret sign of early Christianity.  A fish is found drawn on the walls & tombs of early Christian burial catacombs underneath Rome.  (2) A proclamation of judgment upon a people.

(1) Jonah was from the tribal area allotted to Zebulún in Galilee (2Ki.14:25 & Jsh.19:10, 13).  Jesus was also from Galilee (Mt.4:15).  Jonah arrived in Nineveh after a miraculous ‘resurrection’ from a fish, as a type.  Jonah’s experience in Jonah 1–2 from the Old Greek version (became the LXX/Septúagint) was a type of Jesus’ descent down into Hades, and then His resurrection.  Ac.2:31 “The resurrection of Christ, His soul wasn’t left in Hades [Strongs g86].”  Jesus didn’t remain in the realm of the dead.

Jnh.1:3, 5, 15 LXX “Jonah went down to Joppa and found a ship going to Tarshísh. Jonah went down into the hold of the ship. They cast out Jonah into the sea.”  Jonah went down to Joppa, down into the ship, into the sea, and descended down into the belly of the fish, symbolic of Hades.  Jnh.2:1-7 LXX “Jonah was in the belly of the fish 3 days and 3 nights. God heard me out of the belly of Hades [g86]. You cast me into the depths of the heart of the seas. The lowest deep surrounded me, my head went down; I went down into the earth.”  Down…down…down…down!

Jnh.2:11 LXX “Then the fish cast up Jonah on dry land.”  The belly of the great fish in the deep is analogous to Hades/Sheól, the abode of the dead, in “the earth” (Jnh.2:2, 6 LXX).  Hades is portrayed as “down”.  cf. Lk.10:15 “You Capernaúm will go down to Hades.”

Matthew mentions Jonah three times.  Mt.12:40 is one.  Another is Mt.16:4.  Then in Mt.16:17-19, Jesus said, “Blessed are you Simon bar-Jonáh. You are Peter a small rock; and upon this Rock I will build My church. And the gates of Hades won’t prevail against it.”

Simon Peter was also from Galilee, as was Jesus and Jonah.  Peter was the first apostle to the gentiles (Acts 10), as Jonah was the first recorded Israelite prophet to gentiles.  Jesus refers to the Galilean Peter being sent forth as the “son of Jonah” (bar-Jonah in Aramaic).  The “gates of Hades” cannot prevent Hades from being plundered!  Jesus conquered Hades!  In Mt.27:52, we read of saints resurrected.  Jnh.2:10-11 LXX is a type.

(2) In the Bible, a “generation” can relate to approximately 40 years (e.g. He.3:9-10).  Jnh.3:3-4 Jonah was 3 days in Nineveh prophesying God’s judgment would come upon that city after 40 days.  They repented.  Jesus was 3 years ministering in the Holy Land.  Judea didn’t repent.  Judgment came upon that evil generation approximately 40 years later in 70 AD, and the temple was destroyed.

Again, the sign of Jonah was twofold: resurrection and judgment.

I know of no Old Testament messianic prophecy which clearly numbered Jesus’ days in the tomb.

What was the “3 days and 3 nights” idiom?  The rabbinic view was, “A complete or incomplete day”.  Jewish Encyclopedia, v.4, p. 475 “In Jewish communal life part of a day is at times reckoned as one day; e.g., the day of the funeral, even when it takes place late in the afternoon, is counted as the 1st of the 7 days of mourning; a short time in the morning of the 7th day is counted as the 7th day; circumcision takes place on the 8th day, even though on the 1st day only a few minutes remained after the birth of the child, these being counted as one day.”  The boy was circumcised when he was more like 7 days old.

Jerusalem Talmud Shabbath ix.3 “A day and night are as portions of time and the portion as the whole of it.”  JFB Commentary Mt.12:40 “The period He was to lie in the grave is here expressed in round numbers, according to the Jewish way of speaking, which was to regard any part of a day, however small, included within a period of days, as a full day. (ref 1Sm.30:12, 13; Est 4:16; 5:1; Mt 27:63, 64.)”  3 days and 3 nights wasn’t literally 72 hours.  Again, 72 hours was inclusively “4 days ago” in Acts 10.

1Sm.30:11-13 “He hadn’t eaten food or drank water for 3 days and 3 nights; becoming ill 3 days ago.”   Gill Exposition “One whole day and part of two days.”  It’s not the 4 days ago of Ac.10:30 (72 hours).

Est.4:16–5:1 “Fast for me. Don’t eat or drink for 3 days, night or day….And on the 3rd day Esther put on her royal apparel and stood in the king’s house.”  Cambridge Commentary “It may not have really meant more than two nights and the intervening day, a part of the 24-hour day reckoned as a whole one.”  Est.5:4-6 Esther’s banquet (at which she ate) was on that 3rd day.  She didn’t fast for 72 hours!

How else might the “3 days and 3 nights” idiom in Mt.12:40 be interpreted?  Again, in regards to Jesus, that specific time period is witnessed by only this one verse.

Mt.12:40 “The Son of Man shall be 3 days and 3 nights in the heart [g2588 cardía] of the earth [g1093].”  Though most interpret this as Jesus being in the tomb, the Greek term for “tomb” or “grave” isn’t in Mt.12:40!  Again Jnh.2:3-4 LXX “You cast me into the depths of the heart [g2588] of the seas.”  In the LXX, we see the expression “heart of the sea” in Ps.45:2, Pr.23:34, Ezk.27:25.  Also Ezk.28:8 “You shall die the death of the slain in the heart [g2588] of the sea.”  And the “belly of Hades”, the place of the dead in the “earth” (g1093), is referred to at least metaphorically in Jnh.2:3-7 LXX.

Perhaps Jonah did die during the 36 hours or so he was in the belly of the great fish…and miraculously then was resurrected by God.  Pulpit Commentary Jnh.1:17 “3 days and 3 nights; according to Hebrew usage, parts of the days and nights; i.e. one whole day, and parts of the day before and after this. Jonah was released on the 3rd day.”  And Jesus was dead for approximately 36 hours.

Here’s two alternate takes on the possible meaning of Mt.12:40:

#1 Mt.12:40 the Greek term for earth (g1093) can also mean land or the (Holy) Land, depending on the context.  Conjecturally, what if “heart of the earth” referred to a land area, someplace other than Jesus’ tomb?  Ezk.5:5 “Says the Lord, ‘Jerusalem, I have placed her in the center of the nations.”  Ezk.38:12 LXX refers to Jerusalem. “People dwelling in the navel [center] of the earth [land g1093].”  Jerusalem or the Holy Land was central.  1Eno.26:1 is thought to mean Jerusalem. “I went to the middle of the earth.”  Jerusalem in this sense, as the point nearest the Deity (YHVH), was the “heart of the earth”.

In Mt.12:38-42, a theme is judgment of that generation in Jerusalem/Judea.  Jesus’ ministry in the Land was 3 years or so.  Nu.14:34 & Ezk.4:6 reflect the ‘day for a year’ principle.  Some may view “3 days and 3 nights in the heart of the earth/Land” as Jesus’ 3–year ministry (begun Lk.3:23) in the Holy Land.  Not as His time in the tomb.  Again, the Greek term for “tomb” doesn’t appear in Mt.12:40.  Although alternative interpretations of Mt.12:40 have been put forth, perhaps this one is more tentative.

#2 Interpreting “3 days and 3 nights” as literally “3 daylight and 3 dark” periods (unequal), based upon the time from Jesus’ cross to His resurrection.  The breakdown is (Jewish days began at sunset):

Daylight #1 = Abíb 15 Friday 9am–12pm the crucifixion process started (Mk.15:25, Jn.19:14-15).

Dark #1 = Friday 12pm–3pm (Mk.15:33-37).  No solar eclipse when moon is full.  He dies after 3pm.

Daylight #2 = Friday 3pm–6pm.  Daylight returned at 3pm.  Jesus is put in the tomb (Mk.15:46-47).

Dark #2 = Abib 16 Friday 6pm–Saturday 6am.  (Lk.23:54-56) The righteous women rest on the sabbath.

Daylight #3 = Saturday 6am–6pm.  Sabbath ends at 6pm, but the women won’t visit the tomb at night.

Dark #3 = Abib 17 Saturday 6pm–Sunday 6am (Jn.20:1, Lk.24:1).  They visit.  HE IS RISEN! (Mk.16:6)

The timing of this view at least fits.  Of interest is Philo On the Life of Moses 1:21:123, regarding the Ex.10:22 plague of darkness on Egypt. “It resembled one very long night, equal in length to 3 days and nights.”

Incidentally, no gospel writer reckons counting to begin from the hour the tomb guards were stationed.

Conclusion: Jesus was dead for 36 hours or a little longer…from 3–4pm Friday until approximately 4am Sunday.  Bible verses in both the Old and New Testaments clearly define the time period meant by “the 3rd day”.  Those Jews used inclusive timing (unlike us in the USA).  And there are scriptural ‘witnesses’ who apply “the 3rd day” timing to the period from Jesus’ crucifixion to His resurrection.

Let’s see one last example of “the 3rd day”, in Lk.24.  v.1 “On the first day of the week the women went to the tomb.”  They went early Sunday morning.  v.20-22 “The chief priests…crucified Him. Indeed it is the 3rd day since these things happened. Women went to the tomb early this morning.”  Here is inclusive timing, which Luke recorded Jesus Himself using in Lk.13:32. “Today, tomorrow, and the 3rd day.”  He was crucified on Friday and raised on Sunday…the 3rd day.  (Again, a parallel is Ex.19:10-11.)

The expression “3 days and 3 nights” was given to that wicked generation.  It’s not for us in the church.  The Mt.12:40 “3 days and 3 nights” was an idiom known by the Jewish people, but as such didn’t contradict the inclusive reckoning of “the 3rd day” in their culture and mindset.  It didn’t contradict Matthew’s own “3rd day” usage in Mt.16:21.  Whether other or additional interpretations of “3 days and 3 nights” in Mt.12:40 are also valid, is speculation.

(Two related topics are “Jesus’ Last Supper Timing” and “Jesus’ Death – the Physical Cause”.)

Evangelism in the Apostolic Church

Very few scriptures in the Old Testament (OT) directly refer to God as a Father, except metaphorically as one of many titles.  The God Being instructed Moses to tell the Israelites His Name in Ex.3:13-15. “I AM who I AM…this is My Name forever.”  Who is this God, this I AM?

In Jn.8:56-58 & Jn.18:2-8, Jesus identified Himself as I AM (and His hearers fell to the ground)!  Furthermore, in the song of Moses, De.32:3-4 “Ascribe greatness to our God! The Rock! His work is perfect!”  In 1Co.10:1-4, the apostle Paul identified the Rock. “That Rock was Christ.”  (see the topic “Jesus Was the Old Testament God”.)

Without citing more passages here to that effect, the executive spokesman God of the OT, the great I AM and ‘Rock Of Ages’…was God the primordial Word (Jn.1:1).  Later, ancient Israel’s God became Jesus Christ in the flesh (Jn.1:14).  We don’t directly know Jesus’ Father God from reading the OT.  Rather, when the Word came to earth as Jesus, He revealed the Father (Jn.1:18).

But the disbelieving Jewish religious leaders indicted their God come in the flesh, and Roman soldiers crucified Him.  Yet Father God resurrected Jesus/the Word from the dead.  Now Jesus rules eternally beside His Father (Ep.1:20-22) in the Kingdom of Heaven or Kingdom of God (KOG).

The Lord destined for humanity to receive salvation, to learn of and become part of that KOG.  That is God’s grand purpose for which we were born.  How does humanity learn of His purpose?

One primary means is through Christian evangelism.  The gospel (euangélion Strongs g2098, Greek noun) about His Kingdom will grow to eventually encompass the earth.  Is.9:7 “There will be no end to the increase of His government and peace…over His Kingdom to establish it and uphold it.”

The New Testament (NT) begins with Jesus’ ancestry and His human birth.  Later is the account of His adult water baptism by John the Baptizer (Lk.3:16, 21-22).  After that we read where Jesus went about teaching, healing, delivering from demons, and preaching the KOG in Galilee…Mk.1:14-15, 32-34, Lk.4:31-37.  The gospel or good news began in Galilee.  And on into Judea, Lk.4:43-44.

Lk.6:12-19 contains the names of the first 12 disciples (apostles) who Jesus chose, as He spent all night in prayer.  Perhaps He spent one hour praying for each (cf. Jn.11:9)?  A significant parallel…there had originally been 12 tribes of Israel.  In Re.21:10-14, the names of the 12 tribes of Israel and the names of the 12 apostles are written on the gates and foundation stones of the holy city New Jerusalem.

The 12 disciples/apostles were all Galileans except for Judas Iscariot, likely from Cariot in Judea.  Although all 12 were Jewish, they had their differences.  Several were fishermen.  Matthew the Levite was a government tax collector (Mt.9:9).  Judas Iscariot betrayed Jesus.  (see “Jesus’ Twelve Apostles”.)

Then in Lk.9:1-2, Christ sent forth the 12 to heal, deliver and proclaim the KOG.  Jesus Himself continued to do the same.  Lk.9:6 they went among the villages preaching the gospel.  This resulted in more disciples for Jesus.  The Kingdom was beginning to slowly increase, as a mustard seed, Mt.13:31-32.  (A mustard seed is smaller and hotter than other seeds.)  also see “Kingdom of God”.

Lk.10:1-11 Jesus then sent out 70 others as missionaries to heal, deliver, and advance the Kingdom.  In Nu.11:16, Moses had selected 70 elders from among the Israelites to assist him.  (Jesus was a Prophet like unto Moses, De.18:15 & Ac.7:37-38.)  Jn.4:1-2 Jesus’ disciples water baptized more than John did.

Luke wrote in a beautiful Greek to Theóphilus, a Greek-speaker (Lk.1:3).  Luke quotes the Jewish old Greek version of the OT (as did the other NT writers).  The old Greek became the Septúagint.  It made God’s word readable and understandable in the Grecian and Roman Empires.  Not coincidentally, the Septuagint is also known as the LXX.  In Roman numerals, LXX = 70.

Lk.10:17 the 70 missionaries were given power over demons in Jesus’ Name.  They were to travel along (v.4), living at the same standard as those who housed them, and weren’t to keep seeking better accommodations (v.7-8).  These 70 prepared the way in towns Jesus would Himself visit.

Mt.4:23-25 as the 70 prepared the way for His visits, multitudes from all over the Holy Land came to hear Jesus.  The good news about Jesus and His healings & miracles spread beyond the Jordan River, to the Decápolis and into Syria!  Also into Samaria (Jn.4:39-42).

Again, this Jesus, the great I AM/the Rock of OT Israel come in the flesh, was indicted by the rulers of His own people.  Around 30 AD or so, the Jewish religious leaders set Him up for crucifixion in Jerusalem at the hands of the Romans.  Jesus died.

But Father God raised Him from the dead (Ac.2:24)!  After Jesus rose, His disciples saw Him alive.  They knew He was risen!  In Jn.20:20-22, Jesus gave them a foretaste of the Holy Spirit (HS) to come.

After Christ’s resurrection, in Mk.16:15-19 He commissioned His apostles to go preach the good news to all the known inhabited earth.  Attesting miracles would accompany true believers.  Also Mt.28:18-20 records where Jesus commissioned them to go teach and make other disciples in all nations.  Jesus said in Mt.16:18, “I will build My church, and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it”.  (also see “Church Structure and Member Functions”.)  This is to be done without Jesus physically on earth.

Initially they were comparatively powerless without Jesus on earth.  But during the 40 days while Jesus was appearing to them after His resurrection…Jesus promised they would soon be baptized with the HS, Ac.1:1-5.  Ac.1:8-9 the HS would empower them to be Jesus’ witnesses in Jerusalem, Judea, Samaria, and far distant areas (in that order).  Jesus Himself appeared to over 500 people post-resurrection, mostly during the 40-day period (1Co.15:6).  Ac.1:15 Peter is with 120 believers in Jerusalem before Péntecost.

Ac.2:1-12 then they were filled with the HS (as tongues of fire)!  They suddenly received spiritual power & gifts, and boldness.  (see “Spiritual Gifts and Tongues”.)  This wonder was a great sign to the many Jews from near and far who’d come to Jerusalem for Pentecost!  v.14 Peter stood up boldly with the 11 disciples/apostles.  v.38 then Peter proclaimed, “Repent and be baptized in the name of Jesus for the forgiveness of sins, and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit”.  3,000 persons were baptized that day, v.41!  (see “Baptisms and Washings”.)

So the gospel/good news was proclaimed in Jerusalem.  Ac.6:7 “A great many [Levitical] priests became obedient to the faith.”  Also those pilgrim Jews who’d come to Jerusalem for Pentecost returned to their respective lands and told of what they’d seen & heard!

In Ac.8:1-5, the gospel spread to Judea and Samaria (initially not by the first apostles, v.1.)  The Samaritan people practiced physical circumcision, ate clean, and kept the 7th day sabbath (as did Jews).  Phillip too had been empowered by the HS, and many Samaritans believed and received the Spirit when Peter & John came to them (v.12-17).  Philip preached Jesus to the Ethiopian Jew or proselyte who’d been appointed a court eunuch, and water baptized him (v.34-40).  Philip continued to preach the gospel from Ázotus (the OT Ashdód) to Caesárea, 60 miles north of Jerusalem.

Then in Acts 10, God revealed to Peter in a vision that the gospel of Christ is also for uncircumcised gentiles.  They too can be saved, in their respective countries!

The inclusion of gentiles opened the door for tremendous growth for the KOG (e.g. Ac.28:28-31).  Many converted gentiles had been God-fearers (e.g. Ac.10:2) who’d frequented the periphery of synagogues on the sabbath…believing the God of the Jews truly is God.

Ac.11:19-21 in Antioch of Syria, a large number of Jews and gentiles believed and turned to the Lord in that ‘3rd city of the Empire’.  Ac.15:35 Paul, Barnábas and many others taught & preached the word of the Lord in Antioch.

The gospel spread to other cities throughout the Roman Empire, as the KOG kept increasing (Is.9:7).

Php.1:14 in the Roman garrison of Phílippi, many brethren boldly spoke the word of God without fear.  In 2Ti.2:2, Paul exhorted Timothy who was at Ephesus. “The things which you heard from me, these entrust to faithful men who will be able to teach others also.”  Teaching the Lord’s salvation, His way of life, and how to love God and one’s neighbor.  The gospel of the Kingdom as a mustard seed was taken to the nations by believing individuals whom the HS gifted.

Personal evangelism (as done by those who have that gift) is a key to a living and growing church.

Col.1:18-23 Paul wrote, that by the mid-60s AD “The hope of the gospel was proclaimed in all creation under heaven”.  It had been preached throughout the Roman Empire and much of the known world.  To both Jews and gentiles.  God was reconciling to Himself people from all nations and cultures, as they became believers in salvation through the sacrifice of Jesus the Son of God.

Over the centuries AD, the gospel has continued to be preached to the nations, on all continents.  In the nearly 2,000 years since the Apostolic Age of the church and the Bible canon ended (latter 1st century), Christianity has grown astonishingly!  Of the estimated 7.0 billion people on earth today, 2.2 billion believe Jesus is the Lord and Savior of their life.  It is estimated that there are approximately 160 million Christians in China; most are in the tens of thousands of house churches not registered with the Chinese government TSPM.  God’s Kingdom government is increasing greatly!

As part of His ‘body’ and church at large, Christians become willing to prioritize Kingdom values above all nationalism of men.  And above cultural traditions and even religious traditions (not in God’s word) which may retard Kingdom growth and peace (Is.9:7).  (also see “Governmental Loyalty for Christians” and “Doctrinal Disunity Impacts Evangelism”.)

The first disciples/apostles saw the risen Lord with their own eyes.  They believed…and became personal witnesses of His resurrection!  However, Jesus said to Thomas and those disciples in Jn.20:29-31, “Because you have seen Me, you have believed. Blessed are those who didn’t see, and yet believed.”

Those things about Jesus, what He said and what He did, were recorded in the NT by the apostles John & Matthew, and others.  So that we who didn’t see the resurrected Jesus, and the whole world since then…may believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God…and receive eternal life in His Name!  Jesus is Lord (Ac.2:36)!  Do you too believe?